<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Correlation does not imply causation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://indessed.com/roscivs/2007/06/22/correlation-does-not-imply-causation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://indessed.com/roscivs/2007/06/22/correlation-does-not-imply-causation/</link>
	<description>a little poison now and then, that makes for pleasant dreams</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sealion</title>
		<link>http://indessed.com/roscivs/2007/06/22/correlation-does-not-imply-causation/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>sealion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indessed.com/roscivs/2007/06/22/correlation-does-not-imply-causation/#comment-117</guid>
		<description>I've usually seen this as "correlation does not equal causation", which is probably a more useful way of phrasing it.  It's perhaps the biggest problem of experimental biology; systems are so complex that /proving/ A causes B is very, very difficult indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve usually seen this as &#8220;correlation does not equal causation&#8221;, which is probably a more useful way of phrasing it.  It&#8217;s perhaps the biggest problem of experimental biology; systems are so complex that /proving/ A causes B is very, very difficult indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
